Alby_da_Wolf said:
Suddenly I realise I misunderstood your first post and that top tier just had PS3. Maybe, though, I'd put some legacy stuff in tier 2 too, so tier 3 should have some more just to keep the difference as large. But not too much more, though, as I fear trying to compete with Game Pass with a similar offer could end up damaging the market turning too many gamers into bulimic consumers of cheap, short and abundant games. |
Gotcha.
Yes they could have offered perhaps PS2 titles that were already on PSNow... or even like the Top 50 of both PS1 and PS2 libraries on mid-tier. But from the reasoning of the boss it is that they know just very few people want the classic/legacy titles so that is why the premium is for those, they expect most to sign the mid tier to have PS4 and PS5 content.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."