By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Alby_da_Wolf said:

A more rational organisation makes sense, but as others said, top tier should offer more than what has been leaked.
Anyhow, a single service platform with different levels makes the gamers life simpler and allows to make them nicer offers, for example users could receive some free weeks of higher level services after they bought a given amount of products and/or services, this is just one of the things that become easier if the service platform is unified.
Then there is a big benefit for Sony, marketing costs drop and their effectiveness rises. This can be more beneficial than the savings on services operating costs.

It combines the features and price of PS+ and PSNow, plus adding a PS1, PSP games plus expect more PS2 games and the trial. What else exactly was you expecting that isn't day and date of all their 1st party titles? And it is also sensibly cheaper than competitor.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."