Machiavellian said:
Well services are not for everyone. I like to explore new games and gameplay and get outside of my comfort zone. GP delivers to me on that front. If I am uncertain, then I can easily steam the game and see if I like it before downloading. This allows me to experience all types of different games but then again this is how I use Netflix as well. Pretty easy to explore stuff I normally would not go to the movies and pay for and I have been reward more than disappointed. Its the reason I continue to sub to GP. I would take the same approach to PS new service as well once it comes out and I can see what it offers but for right now, I am content with just PS Plus. |
Yep I agree, that is the reason even though GP is an excellent service it doesn't have 100% of the userbase while at the same time being considered cheap by most standards one could use.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."