By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian said:
DonFerrari said:

On my end it is usually more about time than money, and if I`m not willing to invest my time then paying for the game is secondary. I do like free games and surprises but I`m a completionist so hardly I would go GP to download like 4 games, try for 15min to see if I may like and them play what I prefered of them, but that is me =p

I believe you are getting the wrong ideal.  Why would you download 4 games and try them for 15 mins.  Why not just download one game and play it enough to decide if you like it.  I only download one game, play it and if I like it I continue to play it until I am done, then I go to another game.  15 mins usually isn't enough to really tell anything as some games can be slow starters.

If you are going to go the short try method then why even download the game just stream it which takes seconds to get up and running and then if you like it you can download it and play.  I know I have done this a few times with some games because I was not sure about the gameplay.  

You can ignore the 4 at a time, that wasn't the point. The point was that I don't download to try a game, I look for trailer and info on the game and if it seems something I'll like I pick it up, if I'm uncertain I won't and likely wouldn't do it even if was free. My son though would certainly love because he swap games like crazy.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."