Who's better at implementing controller gimmicks, Nintendo or Sony?

[Azzanation]

PotentHerbs said:

Azzanation said:

Dont forget, Haptic Triggers was on the X1 and HD Rumble was on the Switch. X1 and Switch controllers already popularised the industry with the features.

I do praise Sony for adding a Voice Speaker, that i want to see standard.

From my understanding, the implementation of those features are not the same as the adaptive triggers and haptic feedback in the Dualsense, and definitely nowhere near popularizing it in the industry. 

There has been heaps of praise for games with good to great Dualsense implementation just in the first year of the PS5's launch, compared to those aforementioned features which aren't even mentioned in reviews, yet alone have the same kind of third party support that the Dualsense is consistently getting. 

I dont agree.

The X1 offered Haptic triggers and that controller is heavily used outside of the X1 eco system. Sure the Dualsense will offer a more refined version of it considered its almost a decade newer. However giving credit for its implementations should go to the X1 controller, back when people acted like they didn't care for active triggers to now it means everything in games.

Switch offered HD Rumble years before the Dualsense which is the exact same thing. And considering the popularity of the Switch, again credit should be given to Nintendo's implementation.