By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
eva01beserk said:

No it dosent.  I understand not removing destiny from competition but to say that they are still fully indepedent and future games still go where ever they want? No thats a partnership and you should pay zero for that as both partys benefit from a partnership. 

> I understand not removing destiny from competition but to say that they are still fully indepedent and future games still go where ever they want?

Exclusivity is a weird bar for not being committed. Destiny is successful in large part because the game is available on so many platforms. There's a reason why Microsoft released Minecraft on PSVR/other PlayStation and Nintendo platforms long after they acquired Mojang. 

Sony is also working on trying to reach a broader audience. They just released God of War on PC.  

Paying 0, doesn't make any sense. What Bungie gets out of this deal is money, financial stability, while Sony gets Bungie's expertise, talent, revenue and profits. 

Wich is why I said I understood why they are not removing destiny from other platforms. Like Minecraft and Skyrim and every other acquisition the previous games. My point was future games. And I understand as well games near release as developement was without the new buyers money. But they said all future games. That's just insane. Or they could just be pulling a classic Phil move and backtrack later on. 

Yea and god of war and uncharted and horizon and all other games released on pc launched years first on PlayStation so they reached a broader audience while still having exclusivity.

You just descrived a partnership again not a buy out. 



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.