By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:

False. Just because *you* say it is true... And you watched a Youtube video from people who believe the same things you do, doesn't make it true.

There have been complete fossilized skeletons of Dinosaurs. Even the T-Rex, making your assertion... False. Go to a Museum some time.
https://metro.co.uk/2020/11/20/first-complete-t-rex-skeleton-found-locked-in-battle-with-triceratops-13625874/

They were a Carnivore.

Basically what you are trying to do here, is forcibly shoe-horn "reason" into a mystical fairy tale.

There is no evidence of a world-wide flood, but there is evidence that there wasn't one.

Australia for example has the oldest, most infertile soils on the planet, it's interior hasn't been touched by saline water and lacks any sediment layers in it's geological timelines.

The Aboriginal people also were *very* good at record keeping via paintings and story telling... And they are the oldest still continuing civilization on Earth at potentially 40,000-80,000 years old, they might have mentioned such a flood considering they predate your religion?

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/22/asia/indigenous-australians-earths-oldest-civilization/index.html

Guns were invented in 1364. We have this thing called "evidence".
Their invention doesn't align to your Noahs Ark "event".

https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/technique/gun-timeline/

This just further reinforces how you are trying to shoehorn reason to try and make your religious stories more palatable and believable.

It's Millions.

Radiometric Dating, Geological Dating... Carbon Dating is especially accurate as it is based on the natural radioactive decay of elements such as carbon or potassium as a clock of sorts to date items.


https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/research-shows-radiometric-dating-still-reliable-again


Or maybe because it is insane?

There is zero evidence your God exists... There is evidence Dinosaurs existed.
There is zero evidence that the creationist timeline as outlined in Genesis is even remotely accurate...

But we do have an idea of planetary formation, abiogensis, evolution and the big bang thanks to evidence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution - Which we can observe. I.E. The Fly test.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038716
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background

The fact you are willing to discard science, evidence, facts, logic and reason in favor of an unproven fairy tale, is just baffling.
It's not a left-wing conspiracy. It's just facts.

At the end of the day YOU need to remember that *everyone* past, present and future was born as an Atheist, that is a lack of belief in your God.
It is only later in life that they are "converted/indoctrinated" to your belief system, which arguably has damaged progress around the world.

But here is a question for you...
There are thousands of Christian denominations, with a different perspective on your bible, how do you know you have the right interpretation?
I mean, if the Christians can't agree what the Bible means, how do you expect anyone else to believe?

Secondly... There are 12,000 Gods, how do we know you chose the right one? Faith? Which literally means blind belief without evidence?

Thirdly, what about the religion that the Christian Bible is based on? Why don't you believe that one instead which is actually an older religion? Aka. Judaism. Or maybe Islam?
I'll tell you why. You were raised in a Christian nation which lacked exposure to the other Abrahamic middle-eastern religions.

I am going to assume you are just trolling, but I had my fun... I don't expect a coherent, logical reply.


Two of them, back to back!
And to answer your question: no, it's not trolling, it's satire aimed at a creationist video. The over-the-top absurdity should have made this abundantly clear.

Don't get me wrong, I love the fact that you dropped like 20 condescending paragraphs, thinking you're owning me. It makes it even more funny considering the Oxford Languages definition of satire: "The use of humour, irony, exaggeration, and ridicule to expose or criticize people's stupidity."



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.