DonFerrari said:
Your very first paragraph talks about dominating a genre. And on Hynad point, he is very much correct, to discuss domination of a genre you look at the data itself (sales, reception, acclaim, impact, historical relevance and permanence, etc). If you were asking personal preference then it would be something that depends on personal preference. And even like that you could say you prefer X to Y because you like X and never tried Y and it would be valid. Still you were wrong on the assumption you made of me not having played their games (I played much more from Rare than Blizzard), I just prefer to use objective evidence instead of opinion to evaluate things. |
I gave you my evidence in my previous response as to why Rare dominated, where is your evidence to prove your point?
Also this article is an opinion piece aswell, thats why their is a voting system.
Rare doesn't tend to do the same games over again. They move on alot. Their domination is achieved differently, while Blizzard will conquer genres and tend to stay in them longer, Rare will make a game that defys everything at the time for that genre and than move to another.
