SvennoJ said: I'm not talking about denying all free healthcare. But why should I be ok with paying taxes to cure someone who refused to take freely available precautions. |
This is the same sort of rationale people use when discussing things like the consequences for smoking, or overeating, or living an unhealthy/dangerous lifestyle generally: if I take precautions and live wisely and you do not -- and you suffer the (obvious, easily predictable) effects -- why should I be made to pay for it? Why am I paying for your lousy choices?
But that's the idea, isn't it?