The_Liquid_Laser said:
Go to the actual post you were responding to. I was comparing NPD to Famitsu. Famitsu's reports are consistent. NPD's are not. Also Famitsu actually reports numbers for software and hardware. NPD does not. NPD's report is basically trash. It is not useful in any way anymore. There are no numbers, and their software charts are inconsistent. If you want to know what an actual good report looks like, then look at Famitsu and not NPD.
Me: "The NPD has never really been fair to Nintendo, so they choose not to share data with them." |
Sure NPD is totally trash and that is why most if not all of the big companies in gaming pay them for their data.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."