KManX89 said:
Meanwhile, Merck, the company that fucking makes Ivermectin says it's not effective for treating Covid nor was it meant to. And your misinformation campaign has hospitalized and killed WAY more people than the proven-to-work Pfizer vaccine:
Hell, the stats speak for themselves: over 98% of Delta cases are UNvaccinated. This is not a hill you want to die on, oh wait, who'm I kidding? You literally are. |
I swear I already posted all the evidence one would need, I guess some people are just too trusting of venal corporations/institutions/personalities, suffering from mental blocks and blinded by hate, politics and ideological rigidity to such an extent that it renders them unable to fathom the choices that others make and see/accept the truth. BTW, gimme delta, I need a natural booster, my superior naturally acquired immunity(for the first 8 months these assholes have been telling people jab > natty) from December is waning, needa top off for the next variant. I actually am quite thankful that I got it back in Dec, wouldn't be fun to deal with delta while still immunologically naive.
And I don't recall ever saying that the vaxx offers 0 protection, pretty sure the data shows around a 16-80% protection against symptomatic disease depending on when jabbed and the gap between jabs and a 90%ish reduction in severe disease. I just don't wanna be a guinea pig and I am of the belief that it is probably wise for young/healthy people to avoid it, esp. considering that there are other options. Hell, who am I kidding, even if I was fat n' old, I'd avoid the jjab and work on losing weight and having things on hand to be fully-prepped for it. Several of my 70-year-old relatives fared just fine. In fact, one is in a nursing home that has constant outbreaks and 2 months ago was mistakenly placed in the same room as an infected patient for a couple days and never came down with symptomatic disease. She caught it once in April of 2020 over there and never had symptomatic disease since despite the numerous probable re-exposures.
Have you ever hear of drug repurposing? And how is it that you trust the deeply deceptive words of a mega-pharmaceutical company that has an incestuous revolving door relationship with government health agencies and has been drowning in a bottomless ocean of conflicts of interest since time immemorial?? Look at these giant whoppers they are putting out.
- No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
- No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
- A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
This is some next level concern trolling. Oh yeah, it's been used over 3 billion times and has a better safety profile than aspirin yet they try to drum up fear about its safety... Could it be that the drug is smeared because it is off-patent and could be seen as an alternative to vaxxing? Once you tell a such a lie you gotta keep doubling down or your reputation, legitimacy, power and control could be at stake.
Look how safe this "very dangerous horse drug" is:
"Ivermectin was generally well tolerated, with no indication of associated CNS toxicity for doses up to 10 times the highest FDA-approved dose of 200 microg/kg. All dose regimens had a mydriatic effect similar to placebo. Adverse experiences were similar between ivermectin and placebo and did not increase with dose. Following single doses of 30 to 120 mg, AUC and Cmax were generally dose proportional, with t(max) approximately 4 hours and t1/2 approximately 18 hours. The geometric mean AUC of 30 mg ivermectin was 2.6 times higher when administered with food. Geometric mean AUC ratios (day 7/day 1) were 1.24 and 1.40 for the 30 and 60 mg doses, respectively, indicating that the accumulation of ivermectin given every fourth day is minimal. This study demonstrated that ivermectin is generally well tolerated at these higher doses and more frequent regimens."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12362927/
This is only an anti-parasite drug, it has no business being used against viruses or in reducing inflammation, STOP USING IT NOW!!:
"Ivermectin diminishes viral load and protects against organ damage in animal models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ivermectin reduces in vivo coronavirus infection in a mouse experimental model. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of ivermectin for the treatment of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), a type 2 family RNA coronavirus similar to SARS-CoV-2. Female BALB/cJ mice were infected with 6,000 PFU of MHV-A59 (group infected, n = 20) or infected and then immediately treated with a single dose of 500 µg/kg ivermectin (group infected + IVM, n = 20) or were not infected and treated with PBS (control group, n = 16). Five days after infection/treatment, the mice were euthanized and the tissues were sampled to assess their general health status and infection levels. Overall, the results demonstrated that viral infection induced typical MHV-caused disease, with the livers showing severe hepatocellular necrosis surrounded by a severe lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltration associated with a high hepatic viral load (52,158 AU), while mice treated with ivermectin showed a better health status with a lower viral load (23,192 AU; p < 0.05), with only a few having histopathological liver damage (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the group infected + IVM and control group mice (P = NS). Furthermore, serum transaminase levels (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase) were significantly lower in the treated mice than in the infected animals. In conclusion, ivermectin diminished the MHV viral load and disease in the mice, being a useful model for further understanding this therapy against coronavirus diseases."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-86679-0
"The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro: Ivermectin is an inhibitor of the COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro. A single treatment able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell culture. Ivermectin is FDA-approved for parasitic infections, and therefore has a potential for repurposing. Ivermectin is widely available, due to its inclusion on the WHO model list of essential medicines."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
"The FDA-approved broad spectrum antiviral small molecule ivermectin targets host importin α/β1 heterodimer. Infection by RNA viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, influenza, and dengue virus (DENV) represent a major burden for human health worldwide. Although RNA viruses replicate in the infected host cell cytoplasm, the nucleus is central to key stages of the infectious cycle of HIV-1 and influenza, and an important target of DENV nonstructural protein 5 (NS5) in limiting the host antiviral response. We previously identified the small molecule ivermectin as an inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase nuclear entry, subsequently showing ivermectin could inhibit DENV NS5 nuclear import, as well as limit infection by viruses such as HIV-1 and DENV. We show here that ivermectin's broad spectrum antiviral activity relates to its ability to target the host importin (IMP) α/β1 nuclear transport proteins responsible for nuclear entry of cargoes such as integrase and NS5. We establish for the first time that ivermectin can dissociate the preformed IMPα/β1 heterodimer, as well as prevent its formation, through binding to the IMPα armadillo (ARM) repeat domain to impact IMPα thermal stability and α-helicity. We show that ivermectin inhibits NS5-IMPα interaction in a cell context using quantitative bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Finally, we show for the first time that ivermectin can limit infection by the DENV-related West Nile virus at low (μM) concentrations. Since it is FDA approved for parasitic indications, ivermectin merits closer consideration as a broad spectrum antiviral of interest."
https://oce.ovid.com/article/00078401-202005000-00007
"Given that little viral replication occurs in the later phases of COVID-19, nor can virus be cultured, and only in a minority of autopsies can viral cytopathic changes be found,33–35 the most likely pathophysiologic mechanism is that identified by Li et al36 where they showed that the nonviable RNA fragments of SARS-CoV-2 lead to a high mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 through the provocation of an overwhelming and injurious inflammatory response. Based on these insights and the clinical benefits of ivermectin in the late phase of disease to be reviewed below, it seems that the increasingly well-described in vitro properties of ivermectin as an inhibitor of inflammation are far more clinically potent than previously recognized. The growing list of studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory properties of ivermectin include its ability to inhibit cytokine production after lipopolysaccharide exposure, downregulate transcription of NF-kB, and limit the production of both nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
You guys can complain about the size and quality of the studies sure, but sizeable high-quality studies cost $$$. Should be asking why it fell onto the shoulders of the little guys and why the govt. has been remiss and has no appetite for anything besides expensive drugs.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/SUMMARY-OF-THE-EVIDENCE-BASE-FINAL.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00430-5
And you know what, Ivermectin may be a "wonder drug" after all
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043661820315152
Another question to ask is why is the steroid dexamethasone still the standard of care? Months prior to the WHO recommending low dexamethasone, Dr. Paul Marik and others following the MATH+ protocol were already using and advocating for the mainstream use of Methylprednisolone upon O2 saturation dropping.
"Methylprednisolone is the most effective steroid to use to treat Covid-19 in the inflammatory phase of the virus. Methylprednisolone has both genomic and non-genomic effects on SARS-COV2 and it penetrates the lung tissues more effectively than Dexamethasone. Areas of the world that do not have Methylprednisolone can use Prednisolone as an alternative. Dexamethasone has fewer genomic effects on SARS-COV2 than both Methylprednisolone and Prednisolone. If providers choose to use Dexamethasone, then they should prescribe the dose in mg/kg and not give a fixed dose of 6 mg to all patients for 7-10 days (equivalent to 30 mg Methylprednisolone). This dexamethasone protocol is modeled after the dexamethasone RECOVERY trial."
Compare this treatment plan-
-to the one put out by corrupt soulless big-pharma $hills.
Hmm, I wonder which one works better and which group is actually in the business of helping people.
Remember, it's coming for you all regardless of vaxx status.
And the 2 most damning, devastating and revealing videos to watch if you haven't already.
