By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dark_gh0st_b0y said:
LurkerJ said:

Well…. you also use the science card. And I bet your demographic has a religious background, which we know very well. It is nice being a high horse isn’t it. 

Why do many here sound like entitled children who want to live in a temptation-free bubble? Do they think they’ll have more time to do other things in their life? I bet not, there is always someone or something to blame.

I'm religious yes... and what's your point? what's the problem in that, isn't that a taboo in the first place? I have lived and witnessed both worlds and I chose the path where I feel genuine love and purpose lies, I didn't find any of that in any science book or any atheist view, or in animalish pornomaniac views

temptation-free is of course unrealistic, the problem is that it has all become about temptation, cold and robotic

focus too much on the branches and you lose the stem

Nah. The world is a more loving place that it’s ever been in some parts of the world and that’s only because religion has been pushed aside. I bet your religion wouldn’t allow two consenting adults to love each other without a list of conditions, rewards and punishments, but hey, it’s all “spiritual” so it’s fine. 

I love how you point to porn as animalish because you feel guilty watching it. Don’t drag us into your self-loathing practices please.

Genuine question. What’s more animalish? Watching porn or having 11 wives on top of many female slaves? Not that I am against polyamory, just curious how getting access to sexual satisfaction through porn is more animalish than marrying many women (and not allowing those women to marry many men).