Yeah, I believe DHS is full of shit and panders to fools. I don't necessarily consider BLM a significant threat either, although they/it has encouraged people to commit violent crime. Honestly I consider Antifa worse, but I'm not sure how relevant they are at this point. Maybe the news is bored of that stuff since it mostly affects liberal cities. *Looks at conservative talking points* Uhmmm... I could name numerous other cities that are blue and have exceptionally high murders. However, Chicago blows them all away (get the pun, like a gun). *Hmm, so that is your current opinion is that the left fear white people and that everything is racist. Now what is the policies that are being proposed from this position.* Yes and yes. The Biden administration was stopped from financially catering to people based solely on ethnicity as well. Also, prejudice and racism are synonyms. So it doesn't make much sense one is widespread but the other is not. I support equal rights. But I find the LGBT and BLM movements ridiculous. Their sole focus isn't equal rights either. I think we agree Biden's current policies mean we will have significantly more people coming and unlikely ever leaving. I think we agree the administration says, "don't come" but has given people incentives to come. We can argue semantics, but I think we ultimately agree about what's happening. Nah, I've got nothing new for you. |
Ahh, so the DHS is full of shit so you just ignore all the documented information they have on their site because well its convenient. Oh well, its not like I though you would even take the time to check it out. This is not the first time I have had this conversation on this topic and every time its the same thing. People hold onto their opinion as if they are in the ocean with a life jacket. The worse thing you can do is ever validate an opinion.
Its not about you naming cities, as I could also name cities, its about you providing solid evidence to support your opinion. If you say all Dems policy is bad, then I would expect you to list the policy. If you say all Dems cities are bad based on their policy, I would expect you to list the policy that make them bad. Just saying "Oh this city is bad" because currently the Mayor is a Dem is pretty weak. Its like saying a State is bad because the Governor is a Dem but then ignore that the legislature are all GOP.
You say the Biden Administration was stopped from financially catering to people based solely on ethnicity. Which particular policy was this. I hope you have something because this would be a very good topic.
It really does not matter if you find the LGBT or BLM movement ridiculous. Let not lump the 2 groups together because the 2 groups are not the same. What particular piece within the LGBT community that you find ridiculous. Really, I could say the movement I see from white people is ridiculous but what the heck would that even mean. I could define it better by saying they are trying to play the victim when they control all the levers within most local, state and federal governments. That would at least narrow down that point. I could also point to policy, institutions and systems they have implemented throughout the years to insure they stay on top.
Prejudice and Racism have very different and distinct definition. The point I was making is that the word racism is used interchangeably with prejudice but that would be incorrect. Its the reason why someone would call you a racist but instead what they were looking for is the word prejudice. In certain instances your prejudice can be racial, depending on the nature of the context but that would still not mean you are a racist. Either way, thats a subject for another day.
As to your last point on Biden immigration policy, well we still seem to be going in circles on this one. You keep talking about his policy and I keep asking what policy. You continue to not list any policy so I have to assume that you have no real clue what either the term policy means or you just have no clue what policy that support your opinion. That leaves us with your opinion being more a feeling you have not really based on anything concrete. If that is the case then we can drop this one. There is no reason to debate about a policy that doesn't exist and there is no real reason to talk about what you are feeling since its not based on any facts.
Since you do not have anything I would guess then all we have discussed were your feelings. Since nothing is based on any real facts or any concrete data, you basically just wanted to get your feelings out. Nothing wrong with that but like I stated, you probably would have done better if you just dropped your feelings and then peace out.
