curl-6 said:
There's no point in doing that. The tiny number of consoles that Wii U sold are almost all long since packed away in a basement/attic/cupboard and replaced by a Switch, so not enough people would buy the Wii U version for it to be worth developing. Plus the game would be better off if it's not held back by the Wii U's capabilities. |
There's obviously no point in doing it but I'm just saying they should do it as a nice gesture to the console. Make an honorific version or something for the sequel of a game that for a good deal of years was known as "Zelda Wii U".
Jumpin said:
You are a very kind Wii U owner. Too kind. Much too kind for such a poorly performing console! Wii U does NOT deserve Breath of the Wild 2. It didn’t deserve ANY Nintendo games. Breath of the Wild was far too much of a treat. It was spoiling an ungrateful console. Remember, if you raise your kids right, you can spoil your grandkids. If you spoil your kids, you will be raising your grandkids. That same old wisdom applies to video game consoles. |
That's harsh, man. The Wii U wasn't spoiled, more like neglected!
My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first.