Kakadu18 said:
Dulfite said:
As I explained in the OP and on the other threads, the developer has to be owned 100% for the game to count for the publisher (and owned when the game was shown as well). There are probably 500+ games that were shown at that E3, I can't go through each and every one to see who was developed by which studio and who owned the studio at the time the game was shown (I don't have that kind of time lol). Obviously if I make a mistake I will correct it, but I'm not including games that seem like minor things the vast majority don't even remember. Most of those games on the list you linked were not developed by a studio owned by SEGA. These threads aren't about celebrating publishers, but about celebrating the owners of the main developers, if that makes sense. Also, I added Jet Set Radio, thanks! |
I would go by publisher, since that would make the difference for me between Capcom, which I voted for now and Nintendo, which I would have voted for if the Camelot and Gamefreak games were included, but that's your call. |
1. We've already been doing it this way for 4-5 threads now.
2. Also, again, I don't want to celebrate companies that pay for things as much as I want to celebrate the people that actually make the game. Nintendo doesn't deserve the glory for RARE making Conker's Bad Fur Day, for example, because they didn't 100% own RARE.
