Chris Hu said:
burninmylight said:
Waits until well after the game is in hand to reply, then calls my post a nothing-burger, great job! And no, those games weren't meaningless, because the Bucks and Nets were both vying for seeding at the time and trying to acquire the first seed, the hold of which wouldn't have to go through the second and third seeds to get to the finals. If they were so meaningless, why did Durant play 40 minutes in each game, and why did Irving play 37 and 39? In fact, the only starter that played less than 33 minutes in those games was ceremonial starter DeAndre Jordan. Why do you never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever answer a single question presented to you, ever? Is it because you don't have answers when someone able to cite facts, sources and reasonable arguments calls you out on your claims, and you're left not knowing how to respond? |
Again the Nets are up 2-0 and will have no problem winning this series so yeah your reply is a big nothing burger and like most people that picked the Bucks to win the series you got false hope by them winning two meaningless games towards the end of the season by razor thin margins. |
When did I say that I picked the Bucks to win? Go back and read my entire reply instead of cherry-picking it please.
See how I acknowledged your query, and responded to it accordingly?
Again, why do you never ever ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever answer a single question presented to you, ever? Can you show me the same courtesy at some point and muster an attempt to address these challenges every once in a while, rather than repeating yourself with the benefit of hindsight?