Captain_Yuri said: While I agree the half and half thing is pretty stupid, it all comes down to western culture and employee subjectivity. Eventually Valve might clear things up or have an Adult corner but it's a wait and see sorta deal. Until then, I think the audience that Steam allows these developers to have access to far exceeds the negatives of some games being denied Steam's access for stupid reasons. |
Yeah, it might be better than nothing, but I promised myself I wouldn't be hypocritical regarding this sort of approach when I started blacklisting consoles. I cannot just make an exception for Steam. ESPECIALLY since I'm a proponent of a game storefront having actual curation and having several people go through a game before reaching a verdict on whether it goes or not.
Also, fun you mentioned Illusion. They totally butchered one of their games (to the point it was FAKKU who ended up publishing one of those).
I'm sorry, but I have principles that are just strict and cannot throw them under the bus, especially when storefronts lead to an Oblivion situation where if you want to get Oblivion nowadays, you have to get the GOG version. There's no "disc version digital download" with or without DRM.
Conina said:
So you want non18+ VN games and choose the Epic Games Store over Steam... because they have none of these games instead of only a big part of them? |
I want a company that either adopts a "no 18+ games here" or "18+ games go, no exceptions (unless obviously illegal)" approaches. I cannot just pick the inconsistent companies. Either you draw a line or don't bother.
At least Epic has been clear in this regard. I'd rather just get the stuff from a site I know won't censor anything and let the fan community make it serviceable, because we've been doing so since ages ago and I like it better than snipped media.
Oh and this also concerns NON 18+ games. We're talking stuff like Senran Kagura, which is mature but not 18+. If it were a matter of just uprating a game to adult ratings, we wouldn't be having this convo.
TallSilhouette said:
I assume it would run iOS games, right? Hard to imagine Apple launching a brand new platform just for games when they don't really make any of their own. If so, it's also hard to imagine it doing a whole lot better than Android gaming devices like Shield or *shudder* Ouya. Then again, people love that Apple logo. By some miracle it might legitimize mobile as a serious gaming platform for more than cheap cash grabs. |
It will just turn into another iPhone for people who want to play Fantasian (yuck) or attempted to jailbreak and want to run emulators. Let's be honest, what games besides otome games and Azur Lane does iOS have?
If Apple is wise, they will at least settle for Mac OS, since it's a lot more open. Either that or a humongous push towards more serious games.
You don't legitimize mobile gaming by making it seem decent. You legitimize it by offering a cross genre experience with major titles in every department and at least a few AAA, hardware exhausting titles.
iOS would fail miserably at any of these.
Captain_Yuri said:
Yea it would run iOS. I think Apple wants to push Apple Arcade more and more so making a portable handheld with something similar to Joycons could make it work. I'd be curious about the price but one thing I will say about Apple is that when they go into a certain market, they certainly put effort into it unlike many Android gaming devices. And Apple's own SoCs are quite powerful as well. It will be interesting to say the least. |
Again, what do they have to offer to me? It's going to turn into another Vita.
Almost makes me wish the jailbreak community would get into game porting just to show Apple how it's done like they've done since the release of the iPhone.