MS vs Sony's lowest selling; Original Xbox vs PS Vita

[ArchangelMadzz]

HoangNhatAnh said:

ArchangelMadzz said:

I mean... is anyone going to seriously argue a handheld that sold bad because of bad support and bad business practices and bad price is better than a home console that didn't sell well simply because it was a new band and took a while to catch on?

Vita has 1300 games though.

HoangNhatAnh said:

ArchangelMadzz said:

I never said the design was bad, I effectively said the design was too good. Compromises should've been made on features they wanted to have and it would've been a more attractive price.

Wait wait hold up. I said the vita had bad support, you responded with that it had 1300 games (a completely irrelevant fact to quality). And now you're saying it didn't have enough support? This has been such a waste of time..

Wait, you said vita lacked sony support, i responded that sony supported it well until summer 2014, then they dropped it due to terrible sale of both software and hardware. Vita didn't lack support, it's just that Sony game can't move the hardware like Nintendo games.

The above is literally what I said. You targeted the support part and said it had 1300 games. Which again, is a silly reply.

Bad support is all encompassing. I called out Sony  first party after clarifying because they releasing some games for 2 years isn't good enough. The hardware situation wasn't good enough, the business practices involved wasn't good enough.