curl-6 said:
numberwang said:
Don't pretend that you can understand nuances of corporate Japanese language to decipher a distinction between units and successors. That supposed incremental hardware update would be a farcical for $399 compared to market benchmarks. We will see if we end up with a New3DS situation (big fail, too late in the life cycle, not enough for the money) or some real upgrade worth its asking price. There is no 4K DLSS upscaling without deep integration into engines, so don't expect advanced upscaling for existing games. It is a strange idea to create an all new chipset with DLSS, a feature that is not backward compatible, just a a mid gen stop gap. That "Pro" better have some long legs and not getting replaced in two years like the Xbox One X was. |
No offense but from your posts here and in other threads it seems to me that what this is really about is that you desperately want to be able to classify Switch Pro as a separate successor just so you can say Switch did not outsell Playstation 4/5. |
I have a feeling many Sony shills will be trying to do this going forward, funny part is, Switch might not even need "Pro" sales to finish #1 in hardware sales.
On topic, it looks all but certain that at this point the Switch will be sitting at roughly 110-115m hardware units sold at the end of March 2022. I think the only way that the Switch doesn't pass the PS2 at this point is if Nintendo doesn't want to.
