Mandalore76 said:
So you support selling devkits to an indie studio a month before announcing the storefront is closing without bothering to tell the developer while taking their money?
|
Companies take your money for products even if they intend to discontinue it next week. So nothing new here to say the truth. Was there any promise of keeping anything with the sale?
Conina said:
Better (but still bad) comparison would be: All movies in the blockbusters and other movie rental stores are still available in these stores, so the running costs for all these stores still have to be paid. But there is no revenue for these movies anymore. These movies are just replacements for customers who bought these movies before or still have a running subscription. |
Not sure what your comparison was supposed to be. But the point is that discontinued products won`t be around anymore. People complaining hardly were really sustaining that business anymore.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








