Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Bofferbrauer2]

vivster said:

All this talk about AMD and an DLSS competitor is weird. Nvidia has already pulled far ahead and they're gonna continually improve DLSS until AMD has "something". AMD won't have an alternative to DLSS until they do exactly do DLSS. So until AMD announces to include hardware for ML we can safely ignore any comparisons between them and Nvidia. I think it's actually pretty insulting to Nvidia to call anything AMD has proclaimed so far as "competitor" or "alternative" to DLSS. So we should really stop those comparisons until AMD actually has something remotely resembling DLSS.

Seriously guys, whatever edge smoothing technology AMD has in development cannot even come close to real AI image construction.

What do you know about what AMD is bringing? I find your post pretty narrow-minded because it makes it look like would be impossible get to the same result as something with taking another approach. That being said, I do not think AMD can fully close the gap to DLSS, at least not yet.

But even just managing to do this partway would be leveling the field quite a bit. And considering how much overhead NVidias GPUs have, it would be especially true for persons with older or weaker CPUs, as DLSS creates even more overhead and thus worsens the CPU limit problem of current NVidia GPUs. And it's those who should actually profit the most from DLSS