| vivster said: All this talk about AMD and an DLSS competitor is weird. Nvidia has already pulled far ahead and they're gonna continually improve DLSS until AMD has "something". AMD won't have an alternative to DLSS until they do exactly do DLSS. So until AMD announces to include hardware for ML we can safely ignore any comparisons between them and Nvidia. I think it's actually pretty insulting to Nvidia to call anything AMD has proclaimed so far as "competitor" or "alternative" to DLSS. So we should really stop those comparisons until AMD actually has something remotely resembling DLSS. Seriously guys, whatever edge smoothing technology AMD has in development cannot even come close to real AI image construction. |
I wouldn't shill for Jensen just yet. It's been shown that AMD can catchup with Nvidia if they want to, the problem is doing this without breaking the bank. Remember AMD is the only company that has to compete in two fronts with under half the marketshare of their competitors: Intel is filthy rich and Jensen's circus has been the main attraction since its foundation. Fighting a two front war isn't exactly easy.
But the fact they went from being the slowpoke to running over Intel shows it's perfectly possible for AMD to come up with their own AI upscaler.
