Mar1217 said:
Good to know. Be it as it may, you never know how and who can actually take their opinions as legitimate authorative argument. |
I mean I wouldn't be so against the pricing if I didn't care about these games. So by that extension I definitely can see if someone else thinks these games are worth it at that price. And the reality is I have enough disposable income to accept higher prices like this. I'd just prefer that not to be the case. The issue for me is moreso that ALL THREE feel overpriced. Not just one or the other. You can probably make a very convincing argument that yeah, actually, two remakes of a Famicom adventure game are more worthy of a $60 price tag based on their nicheness and level of quality relative to the genre than the other two products. In fact thinking back on it, that argument might even be one I agree with (I kind of don't, but it's reasonable). But then, you'd still have the other 2 games to justify.
As I said the direct wasn't even bad. It just gets more annoying the more I think back on it ... that having interest in a Nintendo game can feel more like a curse than a blessing. And I realize that similar stuff is said a lot around here in a very melodramatic way, but in this scenario if you're going to regurgitate old games, at least offer them at prices which are fair or marked down. I think that is a more than reasonable proposition and a valid perspective, even if the market will end up disagreeing (at least, that will definitely happen in Zelda's case ... but I honestly think that speaks more towards franchises being too big to fail).
