By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SvennoJ on 10 February 2021
Edit Thread
useruserB said:
SvennoJ said:

Some conclusions from the WHO mission to China, nothing new really

- Virus came from bats, most likely via transmission of an in between (still unknown) other animal.
- It didn't start at the Seafood market (already known there were earlier cases) and it seems to be just an early cluster although the market did also sell domesticated animals "some of these animals have been traced to farms or traders in regions that are home to bats that carry the virus that is the closest known relative of the one that causes COVID-19." It could also have been transferred via frozen seafood, but most likely just through an already infected person (Chinese health officials note that only surfaces at the market tested positive for the virus, not any of the animal products. there were cases elsewhere in Wuhan around the same time as the market cluster)
- The lab theory just doesn't hold any ground, very unlikely
- The joint investigation left open the possibility that the virus could have been spread to humans through frozen food products, a bit of a surprise as foreign experts have generally played down the risk...


Anyway, still unknown where or how it started.

huh I thought it was becoming more and more mainstream to admit that the most likely origin was from a lab in china. You know the lab where virologists collected bat coronaviruses to carry out gain of function research... the same lab that just so happened to be in the region that was the first epicenter of the pandemic.

Does anyone actually trust the WHO especially given their track record of regurgitating ccp talking points and how controlled/delayed the "investigation" was yet somehow they were able to conclude that a lab origin was unlikely?? lol

Even Dr. Campbell knows...

https://youtu.be/hc9apjRpbgg?t=1092

More mainstream in the twitter sphere perhaps. Scientific sources have long ago ruled out lab produced virus and escape of bat samples is very unlikely and even more unlikely to directly infect anyone. A mutation needed to happen first in an intermediary animal and all signs point to it being a natural mutation.

What they mostly looked at is how it got to the market
https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2021/02/09/who-coronavirus-origin-wuhan-china-peter-daszak-interview-anderson-ctw-intl-ldn-vpx.cnn

The first identified case was already confirmed to have been on November 17th 2019, long before the market outbreak. And suspicion is that it was around in October already https://www.wsj.com/articles/possible-early-covid-19-cases-in-china-emerge-during-who-mission-11612996225

Which would explain how it got to Europe so early through the Military olympic games in Wuhan, after which many athletes reported they got sick. It was already in Italy in December, confirmed from waste water, around the same time it was discovered at the Seafood market.