| RolStoppable said: Technology won't be a problem to make a worthy Switch successor when there is a long term partnership with Nvidia. |
Yeah, I think they have everything in hand for making a system way better than what they could come up with at the time Switch was being developed. I believe I'm just afraid they will screw up, mainly said relation with NVidia. And I didn't say they had to release a successor in 2 years, just that they could, and even then the timing would be good for them. Later than that, even better for the company. If they manage to keep the sales curve, with minor dips, for the next three years or so it would be mind-blowing for me (not that I don't think it's possible; just because it would be something somewhat new when Nintendo related) and an even better scenario for their next machine. I hope they can pull it off.
As for the AAAs, I agree that they do not absolutely need them, but those ones do make an impact. Someone said, in this very forum iirc, that Doom was the turning point in the life of the Switch, even more than Zelda, not because of sales potential, attach rate or gameplay possibilities, but because it had shown what was possible on the little machine, and I tend to agree. If they are given 2, 3 or even 4 more years from now to present a successor, I think people will expect something pretty capable visual-wise. I know I will. :p
My 1000th post: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9368779







