BTW, any crime that's not premeditated, and doesn't have the words driving under the influence, are very hard to prosecute.
Usually, because it's an accident that prosecutors are trying to exploit to up their conviction rate.
In a case like this, there is no motive, the defendant is legally sane, and according to his recount and the physical evidence, everything he did in the case was within plausable legal limits, if skirting the edge of them, admittedly.
Honestly, the law isn't set up to prosecute vigilanties. Courts never assume they really exist. I mean, someone who would take the law into his own hands to protect his fellow citizens? Surely you jest.
Fortunately for vigilanties, however, the law doesn't account for the motive of "These people deserve to die because they are dangerous felons causing harm on my friend or neighbor."
If he had a motive that would be it. I'd just be hard to argue in court, and trust me when I tell you, the only places in the country your gonna get a conviction on a case like this is California or New York.
Texas and the rest of the south would probably hold a parade for this guy. Those states are a lot more pro-death.
Has anyone ever seen the show "I Survived" which often recounts tales from the actual survivors of horrible acts by criminals or nature? I've often watch wishing I could have been there when a perpetrator was raping an old woman or beating her, or cutting her throat, or stabbing her with a dagger.
Why, you might ask yourself, Zen, would you want to be there?
Easy. Because I would kill that criminal. I wouldn't simply kill them. I would mangle them with my bare hands, and murder them with their own tool of murder, no matter how much they screamed or begged for their life.
...and you know what? No jury in the country would convict me of their murder. Even if it was on videotape. Because sometimes, people do things so vile, and wreched, and evil, that they deserve to have those same sins visited upon them.
Of course, that has nothing to do with this case, but if you think I'm the only man in america who would still stand up to protect the weak and innocent from the vile and wicked, and not set down afterwards and have a big long sulk about how sad it is they got killed, then you're kidding yourself.
Even in the Internet age, the abuse of the innocent is still the worst crime we can commit.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
