By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:

Considering Nissan, Mitsubishi and several other major Japanese companies were "merged" (bought) by oversea companies and Sony had massive share holders outside of Japan I doubt there is any law that would prevent Nintendo from selling if they wanted, I would guess MS lawyers would know the law. And if such a law existed then MS wouldn't even be able to open a company over there as they do or open a studio there as they intend.

Yeah, I assumed they were just spouting bullshit. Pretty sure I've actually called them out on that before and they refused to answer that time too.

Somebody posted something about Japan tightening laws on foreign ownership earlier, but that's literally just a law that requires vetting before the purchase can go through to protect national security. ie. no selling to suspicious Chinese companies. It certainly isn't a "no foreigners allowed" law.

I now I have heard and perhaps even seem things against hostile takeover not being something outsiders can do in Japan. But haven't seem laws forbidding to buy in mutual agreement.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."