Ka-pi96 said:
Disagree. You don't need to do something yourself in order to judge it. You don't need to get shot to know that getting shot is bad, just like you don't need to play a game to know that it's good/bad. It does help, but there are also other ways to figure that out. |
The meaning of thinking something is overrated is the you don't find the rate/score of that thing appropriate, hence you need to make your personal rate for that thing. How can you rate something you don't know?
Of course you need to experience the thing yourself to know if it's good or not
Otherwise is just plain prejudice and wishful thinking
Or worse, it's construct your opinion on someone's opinion
About your argument
Getting a shot is bad based on the consequences of it. Objectively you will have your leg hurted, that's bad (well most people will agree that it's bad)
Gaming is a subjective experience and your opinion is not complete until it goes down to your own physique
You can rate objective things in a game as well, if the game has stable framerates or not, you don't have to play to know that
You can also rate subjective things, like graphics. You can figure out the graphics only watching gameplay for instance and then state that you find the graphics or the story overrated
You can listen the soundtrack, and then call the soundtrack overrated
But to judge the game as a package, the game itself, the only way I can think of is to playing it yourself