ssj12 on 30 June 2008
| TWRoO said: I'm sorry but that's awful. He confronted them, and spoke to them, and he shot them BOTH in the back? I'm all for "protecting yourself" in your own home and everything, but this doesn't exactly sound like self-defense. I mean if he confronted them like that he must have had time to aim, in which case he should have shot at the mans leg at worst, but really shouldn't have shot at all unless they threatened him, which they can't have been because he shot them in the back... Then there is the fact he shot both of them! |
in the US if you shoot someone in anyway other then killing them in self defence they can sue you for assault with a deadly weapon meaning that his intention of doing the right thing would have landed him in jail with a massive lawsuit from the real criminals against him.
But I disagree, he did a nobel thing. If you dont like the fact that people like him actually did something right then its your problem but frankly i know if someone was trying to steal from someone living around you that you would feel guilty as hell that you did not stop them if you knew it was happening and the police were not goinig to be able to stop them in time.
