By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pikashoe said:
DonFerrari said:

No one is a very strong word, you can say you didn't mean it, but yes that was the line Phenom was taking.

I looked through his posts again. And nope that was not the line he was taking. He was clearly saying that 3rd party games contribute to PlayStation HW sales and that the extra HW sales that 3rd partys provide add more to 1st party sales than the competition from these same games takes away.

I understand that English may not be your 1st language so you may have misinterpreted what he meant. 

Sure pika, and I understand that because you agree with him you may not have noticed the tone, personal accusations and the intention to downplay the sales of Sony exclusives. If you read this and other threads you'll see that at most Sony fans have been saying Sony is approaching Nintendo level of sales and this is shoot down with exaggerated comparison and "to reach Nintendo you have to sell this much...." and that quantity keeps changing to the point even most Nintendo titles doesn't qualify.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."