By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
eva01beserk said:
DonFerrari said:

Why should they patch ps5 to another version worse than It was before this patch? Better unpatch whatever they made that broke it.

Wasent the guy from DF saying something about returning to a previous version? I thought you could do so. I never tried but he mentioned that and I thought they reversed it or something. 

I saw he saying to not update. Didn't see mention of uninstalling the patch. But yes I'm in favor of whatever patch AC team put for PS5 removes the parts that impacted PS5 negatively as there is no reason to make a patch that make things worse.

JRPGfan said:
Shiken said:

And my point is that just because that bottom resolution is hit in a momentary instance, that does not mean the resolution is automatically lower overall.  In fact they both average around 1440p, which would suggest that there are points where the XSX has a higher max resolution, or has enough instances where the resolution is higher to even it out.  It is simple math really.

And that is where the problem with your claim lies.  You want to split hairs for a momentary instance where the resolution drops to 1180p, but don't want to split hairs on the fact that certain special attacks can make the PS5 frame drop to 56 fps where the XSX maintains 60 fps.  If you want to split hairs, you have to do it both ways, and that will end in a tie.

Digital Foundry and NXgamer both say it is.
As do others.   Avg resolution is lesser on the XSX.

Doesn't VGTech or NXGamer also measure the time at each resolution? Because Shiken is trying to ignore the difference in framerate because he saw one glimpse of a 56fps and saying that the lower resolution is also for a short period.

Well there is no mistake, if the solution for the drops on Xbox (that were bigger than on PS5) was to lower the resolution, then the performance gap is basically the same (traded res for frames) so if PS5 had advantage before it still mantains it now.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."