Shiken said:
In particular it seems like when special attacks like when the enemy kicks dirt on the screen, the PS5 will drop to as low as 56 fps. Much like how the XSX only drops to that bottom resolution in an isolated moment and does not reflect even a little bit of the average resolution however, it is splitting hairs. That is why I call it a tie and conclude that if the PS5 had the same bottom res as the XSX, the frame rate would not drop in those instances either. Like I said, I go off of what I can see in front of me, rather than narration alone. It is always better to double check rather than just go off of what is being said, because you may notice things that someone else may have missed. I used to be one of the writers who did comparisons for the PS3 and 360 back in the day for LensOfTruth, when the site was still up. So I guess old habbits die hard lol. |
Thats just it....
Your quoteing a NXgamer video... where in it you notice 1 single tiny bit (like a secound) of action.
The same guy, NXgamer, used a program to analyse frames shown on both, playing through a sequence of say 1hour or something.
He analysed the differnce in terms of FPS, and came to 0.02% differnce statistically.
you can cherry pick, 1 single moment you see.
But its odd your source, is the same, as the guy claiming there is no differnce, statistically.
This is why people use graphs and analyse data.
1 single tiny moment, in a game doesnt represent how the entire game will run.
The best idea, is to look how it plays over a long periode.
When you do that, you can compaire how often X drops frames vs Y ect.
Which is what he does.
He says theres only a 0.02% differnce in performance between the XSX and PS5.
