Famitsu Sales: Week 46, 2020 (Nov 09 - Nov 15)

[Eagle367]

src said:

It is amusing to see posts that have no actual point try and respond to my posts.

RolStoppable said:

Do you have any credible source that hints at or confirms that Nintendo is paying for exclusivity of specific games?

Yes, Capcom themselves via the recent leak. Or is reality to much for some to handle here?

Wyrdness said:

How did Nintendo lose MH when it originated on PS platforms and was on PS2, PS3 and PSP as well as PC? DQ was also on PS platforms from the PS1 era through to the PS2? Not only do you have no actual point here you don't really have a clue on what you're on about either. TWEWY was on mobile and I guarantee you the NS version of the second game will outsell the PS4 game.

This isn't rocket science.

Nintendo lost MH after having it exclusive for an entire generation, a total of 5 exclusive games reduced to 1. Having DQ9 was amassive third party exclusive, alongside its numerous spin offs, of which Nintendo have lost nearly all.

Its not about the point of origin, its about the change in hands. Bringing up TWEWY mobile is desperation at its finest, when the contention was console sales. It would be worrying for Nintendo if a prior Nintendo exclusive somehow didn't sell more on its future console than on PS.

Show me where it says Nintendo paid Capcom for timed exclusivity?

https://www.resetera.com/threads/capcom-ransomware-leaks-thread-check-op-for-latest-contents.327053/

I have the link right here. It mentions Sony and stadia paying Capcom but I can't seem to find any mention of Nintendo doing the same.