Famitsu Sales: Week 46, 2020 (Nov 09 - Nov 15)

[Eagle367]

animegaming said:

Eagle367 said:

Wait how is it obvious that Nintendo is the 2nd most aggressive with it? We only have the one example here compared to Sony where we have many examples. You can't just take one example and run with it. Can you give more examples with references please?

The biggest example I can think of is Dragon Quest 11S, it was announced the other platforms would be getting the additional content (albeit having to buy the game again) around the time the Switch port turned a year old, then there is Octopath Traveler and Daemon x Machina which got ports to PC around 6 to 12 later which is usually the window that time exclusives last and those were games that Nintendo was heavily marketing prior to launch.

Wait those are just assumptions and not proof. And didn't Nintendo literally finance part of Daemon C Machina and publish octopath traveller in many places? That's different than what Sony dies where it's just paying outright for timed exclusivity or exclusivity. Would Daemon X Machina exist without Ninty and would octopath be published everywhere without Ninty?

Also I can't find anything about Nintendo [aying Capcom for monster hunter rise timed exclusivity in the leak. https://www.resetera.com/threads/capcom-ransomware-leaks-thread-check-op-for-latest-contents.327053/

None of the articles mention it either. Could it be that they just started development late for other platforms because of decisions made later on?