sethnintendo said:
Think most Nintendo fans on this site are more interested in sales than comparing pixel count. We already know we lost the graphics battle but Nintendo art style still shines even on less powerful hardware. It's just those pesky third party companies that we have hard time courting. |
It doesn't stop being console war just because it isn't about the power of the hardware. And not to forget that we occasionally will have people on the "artstyle is more important, so since I like this game more then my console is more powerful".
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
