By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nate4Drake said:
DF clearly said PS5 performs BETTER, with XSX having screen tearing much more often, and can't even mantain 60 fps or close to when res drops to 1440p. In the scene where people move around with torches in the small village, in the whole scene PS5 keeps a perfect 60 fps with just a small drop to 58 fps, than back to steady 60 fps. XSX stays constantly below 50 fps, down to 46 fps, than 48 fps, and stay there. This is a massive 15% performance difference, plus add XSX is tearing much MUCH more, and there are many scenarios where PS5 version does not have screen tearing at all.Also, PS5 stays at higher res in many scenarios. DF said that. PS5 is the superior version, and not even by a small margin.

He corrected that. 15% is the average for the clip. When it drops for 46 vs 60 (that he speculate could be lot more since it have v-sync and is capped) it is 24% better on PS5 or 30% worse on Xbox depending on which you prefer to use.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."