vivster said:
It seems AMD hasn't jumped yet at the idea of dedicated cores for auxiliary functions like Nvidia has. So I doubt we can expect anything beyond some post processing half accelerated by hardware. It's why AMD's RT performance is so bad right now, because it takes away cores from rasters. That's why I'm also kinda pissed that AMD is harping so much on that power efficiency, which of course is much better if you don't waste space and power on RT and Tensor cores. I would like to see some power efficiency graphs with DLSS and RT turned on.
DLSS 1.0 wasn't that bad. If AMD can whip up something on their first try as performant as DLSS 1.0 I'd be impressed. |
Erm... what?
If you set the resolution by hand to match the framerate you got with DLSS 1.0, you got the same framerate with a better, clearer picture. In other words, DLSS made it worse than you could do by yourself. Why do you think everybody ridiculed DLSS at release?
The Nintendo eShop rating Thread: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=237454 List as Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aW2hXQT1TheElVS7z-F3pP-7nbqdrDqWNTxl6JoJWBY/edit?usp=sharing
The Steam/GOG key gifting thread: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/242024/the-steamgog-key-gifting-thread/1/
Free Pc Games thread: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/248138/free-pc-games/1/