By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:
Don't need to do ALL this workaround tô defend Phill. Just ask yourself the question, If Halo Infinite launched with the console would be say It isn't important to have a good launch lineup? Since you know he wouldn't then it's quite obvious he is doing damage Control.

Of course he is. I don’t think anybody is disputing his spin. That said you have to agree a launch is more dependent on supply then killer apps. It’s both, spin and fact. Halo serves a greater good launching next year, though it sucks to wait. 

Of course It is. I have agreed with this on the news section and here. They would sell basically ALL they put out, and Will be like that for até least a couple months. That IS what rubs Salt in the wound because the way he puts doesn't really acknowledge the issue of not having a lineup basically spinning It out tô a non-issue. And you know that some are defending the speech instead of Just pointing out that It is factually correct but still without Tate.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."