Assassin's Creed Valhalla: PS5 vs Xbox Series X - Updated NX Gamer - Update Digital Foundry

[eva01beserk]

JRPGfan said:

eva01beserk said:
Digital foundry is taking its time with this game. They just did a watchdogs legion analysis and said they dint have a ps5. So it was a raytracing comparison of xbox and pc and said the ps5 should perform the same. Also claimed that both consoles match a 2080 in gpu performance, but turn on RT and a 2060S should match them.

Someone asked John if its true the PS5 version runs better (on avg better frame rates, less frame tearing)

John Linneman: "Yes, this is true. I'm not working on that vid, though"

^ that was his reply on twitter.

Edit: Found it:

Yes, this is true. I’m not working on that vid, though.

— John Linneman @dark1x.bsky.social (@dark1x) November 13, 2020

here is the proof:

PS5 spends 98,1% of the time at 16.67 ms or under.
XSX spends 88,92% of the time at 16,67 ms or under.

PS5 keeps 60 fps alot more often than the XSX in this game.

Found this interesting from june. Looks like What devs where claiming about ps5 being easy for development  true after all.

I mentioned one aspect of the system design choices being different. Imagine when people have more time to really optimize their code/data and hit these caches more often. https://t.co/AIpTLZHu0Q https://t.co/6PJJfhpWMc

— Matt Hargett (@syke) November 11, 2020

That is certainly one dimension of reducing inter-fabric latencies. cache latencies/invalidation and inter-core bandwidth are primary problems to solve for 120fps gaming, more so than raw RAM bandwidth IMO. latency on going out to RAM is a killer when your frame time is 8ms.

— Matt Hargett (@syke) June 30, 2020