Hiku said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Oh, so now my posts are trolling? That's incredible. Can you please paste the rule in here that says that if the great Hiku quotes you from a different conversion with someone else and gives his own assumptions and speculation on a subject, you have to respond? Because it seems to me that you are just bothered that I am not taking the time to respond to you and address your assumptions on speculation. But the thing is, I don't have to. I've made two or three posts in the thread before you started down this course, and none of them were trolling or without substance. You act as if I have twenty posts in here and am just making goopy style nonsense console warz posts or something. It's ok, it's not the first time you've been wrong in that regard. If you truly feel my posts in this thread violate some rule, then well, as you said, you are a mod. Do something about it. Again, won't be the first time you've been wrong in that regard. Otherwise, continue to quote me all you want, you aren't getting a reply on the matter from me. And no, that doesn't mean I am TROLLING lol. Jesus Christ.
Wasn't it just recently that mods were saying Xbox discussion is supposed to be in a better place? And yet here you are, as a mod, basically throwing a fit because you want to shit in my cereal with your own speculation to downplay something I am not even trying to claim, and I won't let you. It would be great to see this sort of draconian pettiness applied elsewhere and not just in Xbox discussion for a change.
|
The rules apply to everyone. You can't refute everything someone said by simply saying they have no substance, and not explain why.
Likewise, if you make a claim, it should be backed up with reasoning, evidence, etc. You provided little to none of that. But if someone then challenges this position backing it up with reasoning and evidence, there's a difference between not responding, and purposefully ignoring posts to repeat the same claim, as if no one refuted them.
"they were waiting on AMD"
"MS was simply waiting for full RDNA2 support."
I wanted you to explain how you think Microsoft were waiting for support for their own technology (DirectX), among other things.
I may have been the only one that directly quoted you, but other people made similar posts to mine. Pretty hard to miss. But in case you did, I directly quoted you.
|
I backed the "claims" up with reasoning and evidence. Also, you're not quoting the entire posts, you're cherry picking a piece of it to make it look as if I am making a factual statement. Like the first quote for example, I said this COULD explain the delay in Xbox dev kits that developers were supposedly complaining about. See, you can mark this down as another reason why you can quote me a thousand times if you want, I am not going to bother with you on any serious manner. Outside of your general pettiness, you use tactics like that in these debates you want to engage in. No thanks, friend.
Also, no surprise to see you say you refuted the posts, which you didn't. But that's really the crux of your beef here, you think you have proven these posts wrong and it really bothers you that the person you want to prove wrong is not replying to you. Get over it. Again, if you think I have done something that warrants moderation, do it. Otherwise, there's nothing else to really say on my end.
