SvennoJ said:
It was more like the console was too costly and to save a few bucks a feature that was hardly used was easily sacrificed to save a couple bucks. Same with Linux dual boot, not worth supporting since it was a loss leading feature. People buying it for Linux only, don't buy games. Since the console was sold at a loss, not a good business strategy. The whole ps3 hack was a good excuse to cover for the removal of Linux. |
I think Sony could make a buck from a PS full version capable of playing all 5 gen titles, just not sure how much they would need to mod the APU of PS5 to match that. Perhaps use the regular APU plus a simplified Cell processor on it with the PS2 and PS1 SW emulated that they had available on PS3.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







