Do you remember NTSC AND PAL?

[SvennoJ]

HoloDust said:

SvennoJ said:
PAL was better for movies, higher resolution (576 scan lines vs 480 for NTSC) and no 3:2 pull down filter. Movies ran 4% faster on PAL in Europe, displaying 25 frames per second from the 24 frames per second original. It was too small of a speed up to interfere with sound.

Actually, it's quite noticable, and when doing final sound delivery we're under obligation to do pitch shifting for 23.976/24 to 25 and vice versa.

I wonder how they did that in the 60's and 70's? But now I think of it, I have read about pitch shift issues with certain movies.