By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:
Immersiveunreality said:

That site you link to is extremely politically onesided.

At a first glance i see :

-Anti lockdown support
-Negative news towards Black Lives Matter
-Positive news towards Trump
-anti censoring enforced by leftists

''If you're tired of cancel culture and censorship subscribe to Reclaim The Net.''

What a joke, a good amount of people that flock to sites and youtube channels like this are part of cancel culture, so selective that they're unaware or ignorant of it.

It's sad what the US has become, if those views are regarded as "extremely politically onesided".

As a Swedish medical doctor I am very critical of lockdowns. We cannot let the cure be worse than the problem itself. It's sad how the covid pandemic became so politicized over there. Sweden never imposed hard lockdowns.

In my view, the whole basis for Black Lives Matter is extreme, to claim that the US is a systemically racist society that must be deconstructed, to demand that the police must be defunded. BLM is much more about revolution against an entire society than it's about racial justice.

Positive news about the president of the USA shouldn't be controversial! Trump has politically acomplished many great things. Trump tries to withdraw the US from foreign conflicts, he tries to correct the US support to questionable organizations and treaties (the UN, WHO, Nafta, NATO, the Paris Agreement), he has improved the US economy, he actively tries to confront cancel culture and the threat from big tech giants against Western democracy.

And cancel culture is the most dangerous movement that threatens Western liberal democracy. As a European, one would have imagined that censorship and cancel culture would have great difficulties taking root in the one nation in the world that was actually founded upon freedom of speech and liberty.

You ignored my point, i'm talking about disingenuous narrative found in the amount of content only leaning one way and not the seperate articles.To make an analogy i would give a Playstation magazine(that has deals with sony) for example, can the articles be right, yes but they tend to have a less neutral tone in favor of playstation so i do not trust them as much as i would trust a reviewer/outlet that writes for all consoles in a skeptical manner.

The kind of people that site clings to i have heard,read articles from, and i know where they stand and also do not think i'm here to blindly advocate for everything the left puts out,i take the same approach with leftist media.

Bolded : Stating that has no use in an online conversation and it even has little use in the corona conversation, you can elaborate us on your knowledge on the virus if you like?