By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
haxxiy on 21 September 2020
Edit Thread
Barozi said:
haxxiy said:

It's not my fault you can't follow my logic. I mean you could if you knew basic maths but that seems to be a severe problem for you.

Sweden currently has more daily cases (in absolute terms) than Denmark.

That's what I already proved. I already gave you all the numbers you need to come to the same conclusion but it's understandable that you won't acknowledge data that contradicts your point of view.

You think I don't know that the amount of testing has no effect on the positivity rate? Please, that's more than obvious. No need to point it out.
But you seem to think that every single person that gets tested outside the group of people who would've been tested either way, is an automatic negative. That's not true at all and the huge problem in your logic. It's also incredibly obvious that the days of primarily testing people with symptoms are long over. So yeah, they are indeed blindly stumbling into a lot of positives because A) the testing capacity is there and B) the authorities want to test as many people as possible to keep everything under control.

I bet if you read an official source saying that one case of rape is reported to Indian authorities each year, you would blindly believe it even when someone points out that this is only the official count and it's happening in the hundred thousands to maybe millions without getting reported.
I can already hear you say: "don't expect me to accept, without any study to back it up, that India must have more rape cases just because you think so."

You can tell even without studies. It's called logic.

There isn't anything wrong with the number of people being tested in Sweden compared to the European average. It's Denmark that would be the outlier here, and since we've last talked, their positivity rate and confirmed cases have climbed by over 40%. I guess whatever they're doing, despite all their tests, must be less effective than blindly stumbling.

Regardless, you seem rather passive-aggressive. It's just a random argument on the internet dude. Getting that emotionally upset with small things is bad for your immune system, and if these outbreaks start growing in your area, I'm sure you won't want that, right?

But if you're down to resort to ad hominem attacks, then there's nothing left to be discussed. Keep hitting that strawman and misrepresenting my arguments all you want...