By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xxain on 20 September 2020
Edit Thread
The Fury said:
Xxain said:

Have you heard of Bravely Default? It has taken classic Final Fantasy and wrapped it up in new IP,  that is new in name only. You should pick it up if you havent.

I have noticed that there is a lot of bitching about the little bits of battle system we saw, based off that it reminds you of XV, without considering the idea that the lead combat designer for the DMC games is charge of the battle system. Square Enix understands that some did not like the action based battle system of XV and are putting somebody more knowledgeable in the field in charge. Is there a reason that there is a lack of consideration for that .... or is it just a cover for " Its not turn based"?

I have heard of Bravely Default, I'm sure it's great, it's not Final Fantasy though. I'm a fan of Final Fantasy.

Oh we have considered that which is why many people here are comparing it to DMC, the question isn't how he added action combat style to FFXVI, I've sure he has done a great job. It's why SquEnix has given it an action based combat system and not what FF is known for, the ATB (turn based).

No no. Bravely Default IS Final Fantasy: enemies, crystals, summons, jobs, gear, ext. SE even list it as a branch of Final Fantasy on their reports.

Final Fantasy has not been turn based in over a decade, and a mainline Final Fantasy will never be again. Square Enix had already made the choice to move FF to action based RPG with XV and the DMC guy is there to enhance it. He's not the reason.