Imaginedvl said:
The Play Station CPU has variable frequency at up to 3.5 GHz; so you should probably compare all with that in mind. https://play4.uk/technology-news/xbox-series-s-cpu-faster-than-the-ps5s-cpu/#:~:text=Xbox%20Series%20S%20CPU%20Faster%20Than%20The%20PS5%E2%80%99s,faster%20than%20the%20CPU%20of%20the%20PlayStation%205. https://www.psu.com/news/the-xbox-series-s-cpu-is-faster-than-the-ps5s-cpu/ https://www.t3.com/news/xbox-series-s-has-faster-cpu-than-ps5-and-supports-ray-tracing And I can go on but you get the point (and if you bing xbox series s cpu faster than play station five, you see all major outlets there). The "up to" speed from Sony is very likely without SMT and everyone is probably agreeing with that even without knowing 100% for sure. So it is probably more: Without SMT: Xbox Series X = 3,8ghz With SMT: Xbox Series X = 3,6ghz But it does not matter anyway. I believe the bottleneck in the S is probably going to be the memory if you are looking to point out something. While they will require less memory than the X (textures?), going from 12GB to 7GB (some rumors are talking about 6GB) for games will be the weakest point. |
or instead of all that mental gymnastics......
The more logical conclusion is the 3 sites you mentioned above (link) that claim the Xbox Series S cpu is faster, were just wrong.
They made those comments before microsoft announced the CPU speed of the S.
Sony have said the PS5 is 3,5Ghz is with SMT on, running full load (so the series X cpu is 100mhz faster).
Also supposedly the Xbox Series S also has variable rates...... the series X has locked clocks, the S doesnt.
(I Believe I read somewhere) (its just ignored or never mentioned)







