kirby007 said:
Dont make such a general blanket statement |
Was remasters criticized to death in VGC by Nintendo fanbase the start of this gen? It was.
Is this collection already showing record breaking numbers? Yes.
Is the thread about the collection and asking if people will buy it showing majority is willing to pay for this? Yes.
Is this collection with lower effort and higher price than basically all others in the generation? Yes it is.
So what part of the statement is wrong? Unless you are not ok with being generalizing, because yes it is obvious that not every single Nintendo fan is ok with the collection being made and much less the low effort.
Veknoid_Outcast said:
It's really more that forum members/hardcore enthusiasts criticize certain business practices and the majority of consumers don't give a shit and buy things they like/want -- manufacturer or publisher notwithstanding. |
I do know it, but still did you look at the other thread in the forum and that majority (I think like 2/3) will buy it?
kazuyamishima said:
Who would thought that the crappy company (Activision) ended doing better compilations. |
That is crazy right?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







