By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lonely_Dolphin said:
DonFerrari said:

I really find it troublesome when someone judge the other by what they think they said instead of what they really said and without confirmation. The first week of training on the company I work there was a very good video and the message stick to me "when someone say something that can be interpreted in several ways give the benefit of doubt and use the least damaging one".

A great message and what I strive to do, hence why I didn't immediately call Alara (who we now know was Runa's alt, explains a lot lol) the racist heterophobe that his initial post could be seen as. As we've seen, there are people who think it's not only fair and just to jump to conclusions but also stand by them even after contradictory evidence and explanation has been provided. It's always good to be reminded that I'm not the only one who prioritizes logic over feels.

I have run into many people in VGC that thinks their interpretation of what you said is evidence and true even when you explain what you said they will keep the version they want. It is really odd.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."