By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 19 August 2020
Edit Thread
Shiken said:
DonFerrari said:

The reason is that there is a good number of people that believe Series X will be cheaper, you can see it in this and other threads. So I created the thread and pool to see how many agreed with that notion. Particularly I don't think MS will want to get this much of a loss on each console to be cheaper than discless PS5. But that announcement from MS saying they won't be beat in power or price is still used by many.

But why include both the PS5 and diskless PS5?

It makes no sense because one of them is already the wrong answer.  🤣

Well there are some that believe PS5 with and without disc will be the same price. But yes 2 answers are wrong=p



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."