The_Liquid_Laser said:
They worked on it 2 years while also working on Link to the Past. There is a 2 year gap between Mario 3 and World. There is a 4 year gap between Zelda 2 and Link to the Past. Considering that Mario World was the first game released on brand new technology, yeah it was rushed. Most people who lived through the NES and SNES eras will say that Mario 3 is better. Mario World mostly seems exceptional, because its the only new Mario game on the SNES. Speaking personally, Mario 3 feels a lot more polished than Mario World. Mario World is too easy and isn't as densely packed with secrets like Mario 3. It's still a good game, not denying that, but it feels rushed. |
Source for them working on both games at the same time?